he was "being rude"? "not his place to be involved in the debate"? That man has been a labour party activist for 57 years. He has EARNED his right to join in "the debate". He's been working for labour since before most MPs were born. How dare you say he shouldn't be involved in the debate. But for people like him, Labour wouldnt exist. As for "rude"! He shouted out "lies" and "nonsense" to Jack Straw. How many labour party memebers on this website see nothing wrong with calling John Leech a liar? Just like you have the right to say that, he has the right to say it about Jack Straw. This is freedom of speech yet again, control freakery run riot. From what I've read, the entire conference has been ruthlessly stage managed to squeeze out any possible dissent and its blown up big time in their horrified faces. The only thing most people can remember from the whole thing is the sight of thugs attacking an 82 year old holocaust surviving peace campaign. Congratulations Labour on another fine mess

Please supply an email address so we can contact you and give a brief explanation of why this comment violates the Terms Of Use:
Email Address:

Reason: