let me get this straight. It is all right for thomas and alan and friends to insult at will John Leech, for whom I vote, calling him a liar , accusing him of misleading the electorate, accusing him of grossly exploiting cancer victims (which really would be unforgivable had he done it). But if in retaliation on his behalf I insult them in what are far milder ways, albeit with a few robust words, then that is NOT all right? That is lowering the tone? Oh no it isn't, matey. I've used a few choice words, and I stand by every one of them because, with the exception of Steve on another thread, they were deserved. Sorry if you don't like it, and you're welcome to say what you want about me without me getting upset. But remember you have been throwing garbage at John Leech since he won, and if you want to live in a glass house then don't throw stones. Don't give what you can't take. You guys set the tone with the attacks on John Leech, not me. And if you think that working for the MOD is a moral career choice, then saying that I lower trhe tone beggars belief. WMD (remember them? Iraq? Remember UK was 1st country to use chemical weapons against Iraq 80 years ago) Thanks for the concern (or was it hope?) about my health, Alan. But it's unlikely. I daren't fall ill, now that Labour's PFI's are polluting the NHS. Final point. Dave's summary of Labour in the posting above is the most perceptive comment there has been on this website and I second it 100% (sorry if that lowers your tone dave)

Please supply an email address so we can contact you and give a brief explanation of why this comment violates the Terms Of Use:
Email Address:

Reason: